30 years ago showed the German television "Our Walter," a miniseries that is not reported from the time of his life by the Federal President Walter Scheel. With its populist nature of the trained singer and precursor Karl would Moik ("High on the yellow Wa aa gene, I sit in the front-law) was just too perfect for the first docu-soap. Instead, it was a "regular" German family and their concerns with her mongoloid son Walter in everyday life, which was difficult for the mentally handicapped. Wim (Thoelke) Wum and later Wendy worked out how to popularize "Action problem child", in which a cap provided with Geldbriefbote (there was then) named Sparbier the winners announced the lottery, which was organized for the benefit of problem children from the second program on German television. Rate between rounds and show elements contributed later the "Grand Prix" preppy assistants the winners names on clipboards on the stage and were sometimes even their reading skills by announcing a winner to the test. At some point, Wim was long dead and the establishment of a quota-oriented show about the lottery luck was obviously more difficult, was then probably paid some minority officers incorrect on that "problem child" as political was how the term "mongoloid" (Dow syndrome, read.) A relaunch was necessary: With the "action man" we got all apparently targeted by the good people of Lerchenberg:
The Honourable Society of the welfare state has joined forces: from the workers' welfare on the German Caritas Association, the Social Association of Germany eV, the social VdK that Weibernetz eV supporters BUND, the German professional association for nursing eV, INKOTA, Oxfam, the Association of German Development NGOs eV up to the "ideological supporters German Federation of Trade Unions "have about 90 institutions with a neo-Marxist-Christian do-gooders alliance under the slogan" In each of us there is a need "(O-Ton), the target group of the old Action Problem Child and its" mission statement "widened dramatically. That the newly formed Communist International, which operates worldwide under the name of Attac inicht, Here is probably the only reason not in the gigantic welfare state campaign associates "represented to broaden with the profiteers of the social budget of their action, their influence and their budget targeted wants. The title "partner", usually with their capital-liable partner in a Company called, is quite misleading. Is not meant finally taking responsibility for their own lives, but their assignment to Caritas and the likes, so their "socialization", which you can share with expropriation. Also noticed similar Bodo Wünsch on his excellent blog freedom, market, legal, where he also kindly the 30th Ludwig Erhard's death remembered.
The purpose of the whole matter becomes clear when one indulges in the blog worth reading "Economic Freedom", where the economics professor Rainer Hank has made the "secret Gesächfte of Charity "Subject to an economic analysis:
Diakonia & Co from about 1.5 million full-time employees and an estimated annual turnover of 55 billion € is the question. But the number of jobs at the big five charity has tripled since 1970. No one knows exactly, because the industry refuses stubbornly to put their data. Consolidated Balance Sheets as one looks in vain "
" It is extraordinary that a growth industry in the services market. - The classic "products" that are not threatened by globalization, because it only in this country "to women and men" can be provided - in the chaotic no man's land opaque darkness ekes out her life: organized labor and between black and non-profit tax-privileged corporatist dominated by an oligopoly of some welfare-caring institutions. Because the ratio would require actually, that such personal services is a perfect example of a market-organized industry of the future may be instructive companies "
But the" benefactor industry "has another claim for their ordinary living:
." Wants to advocate for the disadvantaged, "we are and for that responsible, "Solidarity in Society to donate. It says so in an "argument paper" to the charity. And this of course not limited entrepreneurial activity, but community involvement, with which one generates 73% of its revenues from public sources without having to face the pressure of competition effectively. Again, Hank.
"The advocacy discourse same time allows to use social demands for marketing purposes, but this to disguise the same time, if ever, the associations of reductions scourge of the welfare state, they do not only in the name of charity, but also to to ensure the financial welfare of their own day care, training and consultancy houses. The welfare industry praises quite openly for, fought for the introduction of Blümschen care to have. It has also benefited greatly from it. Not surprisingly, before this background that the industry is now also makes it particularly strong for the Leyensche of the Krippenbauprogramm. Supply-induced demand management economists call this method. It is known mainly from the NHS. "
better to have no real intention of the merged when the company can define welfare state mafia. It is finally also to the maintenance of "charity". Alone due to elimination of corporate and business tax the benefactors of some 600 million DM save, set free the resources of its volunteers as well as community service (for which the de facto a "special tax for young military men fit") and they may issue contribution receipts (even if that makes only 3% of their income) . A tradition that began in 1916, when the Catholic Caritas discovered the welfare state as a funding source, and thus began the gigantic growth of the welfare state industry. But Hank has
out that private providers, wherever they happen to win, despite competitive disadvantages against the subsidized charitable massive market share. Another reason why the "Shareholders" Profit-making and entrepreneurship demonize. They are afraid of the competition.
The campaign is sneaky, because it spans many good people in good faith before a commercial truck, but denied they stamped on the website and the media they are partnerships of ARD, ZDF has mirror to fraud. It is but it seems to participation and civil society to liability, it does not work. The media provide banner advertising space and time free of charge, are likely to have a million-dollar value and are recorded by the campaign professionally. Testimonials represent the ordinary citizens will be presented perfectly illuminated. Gideon Boess, the absurdity of these statements at WOMD satirized perfectly.
The expensive presentation and the extensive benefits that are obviously an increase in sales and Gewinnabzielungsabsicht provide the privilege of non-profit in question. In the Eighties, Otto Graf Lambsdorff in view of the failure of public service activities (or should it better common hot economic) of the DGB for "New Home", found "bank for social economy" and "COOP", "self-interest, common good, wretch" . Would add nothing to the cause.
If it were not that weird event last Sunday, when a handful of people through the center of Berlin subjected to point to hundreds of thousands of murdered and displaced hundreds of thousands and millions of starving people in Darfur, Sudan. Where they were, the "Shareholders". But it was not about the income of the German welfare state industry.
0 comments:
Post a Comment